|

Do We Really Need Fluoride In Water?

by Sahana Singh

Have you ever wondered why we need to have fluoride in drinking water when there is already fluoride in our toothpaste?

The October 2010 issue of the journal of the American Dental Association has confirmed that infants fed with formula milk prepared from fluoridated water run a greater risk of fluorosis (mottling and discolouration of teeth enamel).

On the same subject, another book published in September this year – The Case Against Fluoride by Paul Connett, James Beck and HS Micklem argues forcefully against the practice of adding fluoride to drinking water supplies.

Among the countries which fluoridate their water supplies are Australia, Brazil, Canada, Chile, Ireland, Malaysia, Singapore, USA and Vietnam. Most parts of Europe have stayed away from the practice. The amount added varies from 0.6 to 1.2 mg/l.

Most dental associations, which endorse fluoridation of water supplies say it is a safe, low-cost way to prevent tooth decay, particularly amongst cavity-prone children.

But the new book quotes WHO statistics to indicate that the rates of tooth-decays in twelve-year olds have been coming down in non-fluoridated countries as fast as in fluoridated ones mainly because of rising income levels and better dental hygiene. “Meanwhile, the scientific evidence that fluoridation may be causing harm gets stronger with each passing year,” it says.

I’m convinced, based on animal studies, clinical trials and epidemiological studies, that drinking fluoridated water for a whole lifetime will increase your risk of arthritis and also increase your risk of hip fractures, which is very serious in the elderly,” said Dr Connett in an interview with the Globe and Mail.The reason for these problems is that half the fluoride people ingest is stored in the bone.”

Dr Connett is executive director of the Fluoride Action Network and professor emeritus of chemistry at St Lawrence University in New York.

We argue that these risks are far too high when we are considering the mass medication of millions of people, the more so since the benefits are now seen to be so small and achievable by other means by dozens of non-fluoridating countries,” say the authors of The Case Against Fluoride.

According to them, when you use the water supply to control medication, you cannot control the dose, you cannot control who gets it and there is no individual supervision.

The book alleges that the governments of fluoridating countries have set up panels to review the safety and effectiveness of fluoridation but by virtue of the composition of these panels, their conclusions are frequently mere rubber stamps for long-entrenched government policy.

It is time for the proponents of fluoridation to do some introspection. In today’s urban world where thousands of people are already on medication for a variety of ailments ranging from blood pressure to hormonal imbalance, and with an aging population, does the water-delivery mechanism really need to deliver one more drug?

******************************************************************************************************************
About our Guest Writer:

SAHANA SINGH is an award winning journalist and the Singapore based Editor of Asian Water, a trade magazine related to water and water management issues. She can be contacted at sahana.singh [at] gmail.com

******************************************************************************************************************
Further links you may be interested in:

Flouride Action Network: 50 Reasons to oppose Flouride

Flouride Action Network with several videos on Vimeo

The Fluoride Deception (Interview With Christopher Bryson):

In this video, Christopher Bryson, an award-winning journalist and former producer at the BBC, discusses the findings of his new book The Flouride Deception. EARLY REVIEWS of The Fluoride Deception: “Bryson marshals an impressive amount of research to demonstrate fluoride?s harmfulness, the ties between leading fluoride researchers and the corporations who funded and benefited from their research, and what he says is the duplicity with which fluoridation was sold to the people. The result is a compelling challenge to the reigning dental orthodoxy, which should provoke renewed scientific scrutiny and public debate.” — PUBLISHERS WEEKLY

Wikipedia: Water Flouridation

Share/Save

Short URL: http://www.ecowalkthetalk.com/blog/?p=5286


Subscribe by RSS      Subscribe by email  

Connect with us on    
We welcome and appreciate your contributions for the upkeep of the site.

 



Posted by on Dec 24 2010. Filed under Water. You can follow any responses to this entry through the RSS 2.0. You can leave a response or trackback to this entry

Leave a Reply

Archives

Our Most Liked Posts (by Readers)
1. GOONJ: Not just a piece of cloth
2. Vandana Shiva: Traditional Knowledge, Biodiversity and Sustainable Living
3. Kanyakumari: The Plastic Bag Free District in India
4. Can One Man and One Cow Save Our Planet? Seeding the Real Green Revolution
5. Joint Statement on Martyrdom of Sheila Masood
6. 6 Beautiful Balcony Plants to Control Mosquitoes
7. UN Report: Can Ecological Farming Feed the World?
8. So Just What is Shark Fin Soup?
9. Why Laughter is good for you
10. Witness to Extinction: How We Failed To Save the Yangtze River Dolphin
Eco WALK the talk on Facebook

We Support
Kiva - loans that change lives
Our Videos
MORE VIDEOS HERE Add this blog to my Technorati Favorites!

Recently Commented

  • Rose Woods: It make sense. Vinegar is recommended as a cleaning solution for different household problems. So, if the...
  • lalit gupta: Really a work which is appreciable.
  • M. S. Venkatesh Prasad: Good Evening, A very useful article. I have started following the procedure set here. I have...
  • Tanmay Sawant: It is unfortunate that the Government has failed to assess the impact of coal to our environment. Coal...
  • Ram Kumar Tusir: I am mvery much impressed by Mr. Raghuvanshi’s contribution in seed production of various...